Make-or-Buy Analysis

Make-or-Buy Analysis

Introduction: Why This Matters

One of the most critical decisions in project management is determining whether to produce a product or service internally or to procure it externally. This is known as Make-or-Buy Analysis. The decision directly impacts project cost, schedule, quality, and risk.

On the PMP exam, make-or-buy analysis is closely associated with procurement management and planning. In practice, it helps project managers decide whether building in-house offers more value than outsourcing to a vendor.

Purpose and Objectives

Primary Purpose: To evaluate whether it is better to create a deliverable internally or acquire it externally.

Key Objectives:

  • Compare costs, risks, and benefits of in-house development versus procurement.
  • Align decisions with organizational strategy, capacity, and expertise.
  • Optimize resource use by focusing on core competencies.
  • Justify procurement decisions with structured analysis.
  • Recognize make-or-buy scenarios on the PMP exam.

Overview

Make-or-buy analysis compares internal delivery versus external procurement across cost, schedule, capability, and risk so the project team can choose the option that best supports project outcomes and organizational strategy.

  • Make: Build internally using organizational resources and expertise.
  • Buy: Procure externally from a vendor through contracts (RFP, proposal evaluation, agreement).
  • Decision drivers: Cost, time, quality, risk, and strategic focus.

Characteristics

  • Planning-first: Most commonly used during planning to decide sourcing approach before execution begins.
  • Procurement-linked: If “buy” is selected, it drives procurement documentation and contract strategy.
  • Multi-factor: Looks beyond cost to schedule, quality, capability, and risk.
  • Strategic lens: Considers whether the work aligns with core competencies or should be sourced externally.
  • Decision traceability: Typically recorded in a decision log and reflected in plans and registers.

Practical Example

Context: An airline was implementing a new passenger check-in system and needed to choose between building internally or purchasing a vendor solution.

Activities:

  • Compared cost and delivery timelines: In-house was lower cost but required hiring and a longer schedule.
  • Assessed risk and quality: Vendor solution was proven and supported, but offered limited customization.
  • Aligned decision to constraints: Regulatory compliance deadlines increased the value of speed and reduced implementation risk.

Outcome: The airline chose to buy the vendor solution. The higher cost was justified by faster delivery and lower implementation risk given compliance urgency.

Common Pitfalls

Cost-Only Thinking

  • Pitfall: Focusing only on cost and ignoring time, quality, and risk.
  • Prevention: Evaluate the full set of factors, especially schedule constraints and risk exposure.

Hidden Cost Blind Spots

  • Pitfall: Underestimating hidden costs like maintenance, integration, licensing, and training.
  • Prevention: Include total cost of ownership and transition costs in the comparison.

Strategic Misalignment

  • Pitfall: Outsourcing core competencies that should remain in-house.
  • Prevention: Consider long-term capability and whether the work is strategic to the organization.

Sensei Tip : If the project has a hard deadline, speed can outweigh cost. A “buy” decision is often justified when time-to-deliver reduces risk or avoids penalties.

Exam Alert : If the scenario is “build in-house vs. purchase from a vendor,” the exam is pointing at make-or-buy analysis, not general alternatives analysis.

Exam Lens

Patterns on the PMP Exam:

  • Make-or-buy decisions are tied to procurement planning and contract strategy.
  • Questions often test whether you considered more than just cost (time, risk, quality, and strategic focus).

Sample Question

Question: A project manager is evaluating whether to develop a new scheduling tool in-house or purchase an existing commercial product. Which technique should be used?

  1. Alternatives Analysis
  2. Make-or-Buy Analysis
  3. SWOT Analysis
  4. Benchmarking

Correct Answer: B. Make-or-Buy Analysis
Rationale: Make-or-buy analysis specifically evaluates whether to produce internally or procure externally. Alternatives analysis is broader, SWOT is strategic, and benchmarking compares with industry peers.

Quick Recap Table

Concept Description Exam Watch Point
Make-or-Buy Analysis Evaluates in-house development vs. external procurement Look for “develop vs. purchase” or “in-house vs. vendor”
Key Considerations Cost, time, quality, risk, strategic focus Often linked to procurement management
Outputs Procurement documentation, decision log, plan updates Leads to contract creation if “buy” is chosen

Key Takeaways

  • Make-or-buy is deciding between internal development or external procurement.
  • It considers cost, time, quality, risk, and strategic alignment.
  • Outputs include procurement documentation and updates to project plans and logs.
  • On the PMP exam, it is directly tied to procurement planning decisions.

Next Step

With make-or-buy analysis complete, we now move to the final category in this section: Interpersonal and Team Skills, beginning with Communication Skills.

Bibliography

Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.

Scroll to Top